Wednesday, August 2, 2017

POLL: 76% of Muslims Are Against Killing Civilians. Only One Problem

Everyone knows leftists are soft on Islam. Feel like spitting out some facts about the trigger happy disciples of Allah? You’ll get nothing but hostility and accusations of “Islamophobia” from progressives. Even you women who dare say hijabs are oppressive. Know your place, ladies. If you ask the left, all is well in peaceful Islam. 

In fact, leftists are gaga over this new poll. It shows 76% of Muslims disagree with murdering innocent civilians: A new survey of political and social attitudes among the US Muslims shows that over three-quarters of the community rejects violence against civilians in the name of religious or political beliefs. The survey, released on July 26 by the Pew Research organization, revealed that 76 percent of respondents agreed with the contention that “targeting and killing civilians can never be justified to further a political, social or religious cause.” Eight percent believed such actions were justified “rarely,” while a further 12 percent believed terrorist killing is “sometimes” or “often” justified. 

Wait just a minute. Aren’t these leftists missing a bigger point? 76 percent of Muslims may not support murdering innocent “civilians.” Kudos to them for participating in Human Rights 101. We won’t get into how Muslims define “innocents” mostly because we’ve already covered it. Read Moderate Muslims in Their Own Words and Laws. Put on your thinking caps, you STEM adherents. Doing the math, 76 from 100 still leaves one-in-four Allah fanboys who have no problem perishing a civilian or two. That’s a bit more than a statistical anomaly. 

A BIG HAND FOR THE PEACE LOVING PEOPLE OF ISLAM
These numbers aren’t surprising. News archives are saturated with tales of Sharia-compliant dude-bros who were willing to spill blood to get their 72 virgins. Don’t believe me? Just wait a few weeks until another radical Islamist gets impatient and kills some kids for Allah. Oh, you’re saying 24% of Muslims being totes fine with killing people is a big improvement? Okay, let’s play a game. What if one-in-four Christians were all “let’s decorate the walls with the blood of infidels”? Or what if the poll found “one in four Christians wants to hang gay people”? You’d never hear an end to leftists’ shrill cries. But, being the would-be mass murderers belonging to a leftist protected class, leftists and media are willing to give Islamists a pass. “So what if one-in-four are cool with splattering our brains on the sidewalk. At least the other three are chill to the max.” 

Again, ask them to define “innocents.” It’s a fun story.  Only a leftist could look at the numbers in that poll and ignore the huge problem staring them right in the hijab-ed face. Three-quarters of Muslims may be decent people who mean well. But, the other fourth present a big problem to anyone who likes booze, women’s rights, having pet dogs, or devouring crispy strips of bacon.  Thanks to  Louder with Crowder

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

The Three Stooges of Healthcare

Thanks to Comically Incorrect
White RINO's are a protected species in some places, 
but we can all hope for that  uninvited poacher 
in their domain in search of a trophy!

Sunday, July 30, 2017

Trump threatens millions of senators with imminent death

In the latest effort at genocide by President Trump, the worst Republican since Hitler, US Senators may face loss of their subsidized health coverage. Mr. Trump ominously tweeted in a manner reminiscent of Hitler, “If a new HealthCare Bill is not approved quickly, BAILOUTS for Insurance Companies and BAILOUTS for Members of Congress will end very soon!” 

If Trump makes good on this threat, women and minorities will be hardest hit according to a report by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. CBO accountant, Fred “Nonpartisan” Phelps commented, “Our figures estimate that if Trump follows through with this extreme proposal, 1.5 million senators will die every minute. That’s 2,160,000,000 senators each day. The first to go will be women and minority Democrats, along with moderate transgender Republicans. The math is positively chilling.” 

Congresswoman Maxine Waters agreed. “What he said,” she said. Glowering darkly over his trademark reading glasses, Senator Chuck Schumer warned, “If the president refuses to make the cost-sharing reduction payments, every expert agrees that premiums will go up and health care will be more expensive for millions of Americans. The president ought to stop playing politics with people’s lives and health care, start leading and finally begin acting presidential.” 

While the Schumer quote sounds as though he were actually concerned for other Americans, researchers at the nonpartisan People’s Cube, America’s most equal and most trusted news source, have found out differently. Through our contacts with anonymous sources and current and former officials, The People’s Cube has acquired the Schumer Translation Device, or STD, which accurately decodes statements by the New York senator. Once run through the STD, we get the actual Schumer quote, “If the president refuses to cave like a good Republican, and cuts off the low insurance rates we legislated for ourselves, every member of my staff agrees that premiums will go up for them and I will actually have to pay for my own health care as if I was one of the little people! This is outrageous! I am a senator! I am your god! 

The president ought to acknowledge our superior status, do as he’s told, and finally begin acting like sniveling Republicans have for decades.” Whatever Schumer meant to say, however, is irrelevant. Leading intellectual senators like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren all agree that if anything other than their agenda becomes law, everybody will die every 15 seconds, and that would be unconscionable. 

Will you join us at the People’s Cube as we stand with our oppressed senators? Should our elected officials really have to obey the laws they lovingly impose on the rest of us? Isn’t it a privilege, yea, a patriotic duty to pay for the health care of our dear elected leaders while we proudly endure doublings and quadruplings of our own health care premiums? Stand up and fight for the privileges of our betters! Stand up and resist the evil of the free market! Stand up and resist affordable health care! Stand up and resist Trump!   Thanks to The People's Cube

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Bring Knife to Gun Fight

For those who would bring a knife to a gun fight, 
there is little we can do to increase your IQ.  
We can however recommend the below item, 
although we serious doubt that even a Vulcan Mind Meld 
could penetrate that ignorant shield you have deployed.  

Illegal Accused Of Sexually Assaulting Two Women Had Immigration Detainer Lodged And Ignorned

One of the refrains we hear from those who support illegal aliens is that they are fine with the “good ones” but not the criminal ones. 

In practice, though, the supporters and sanctuary jurisdictions look to protect all illegals. Like this upstanding one (Oregon Live) Federal immigration agents lodged a detainer in December 2016 against the man accused of attacking two women in Northeast Portland this week, officials said. 

When Sergio Jose Martinez was held in the Multnomah County Jail on Dec. 7, 2016, U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement requested local authorities notify the agency prior to releasing him, spokeswoman Virginia Kice said in a statement to The Oregonian/OregonLive on Friday. 

Martinez has been deported 20 times, according to Multnomah County court documents. He has a lengthy criminal record that includes several convictions in Oregon and burglary convictions in other states, according to court documents and the immigration agency. Local authorities released Martinez on Dec. 8, 2016 without notifying immigration authorities, Kice said. Oregon law prohibits public agencies from spending money, using equipment or enlisting personnel to enforce federal immigration law. Martinez would qualify as one of the “bad ones”, wouldn’t you think? 

In this case, ICE was not even asking for a hold, just a heads up for when he would be released so they could come get him. Is it really so burdensome to place a call or send an email? Martinez is accused of sexually assaulting a woman in her Northeast Portland home on Monday morning, then stealing her credit cards and car. Police say he attacked another woman in a parking garage later that day. He is charged with several crimes including first-degree robbery, sex abuse and robbery and second-degree assault. 

These crimes are on the heads of Sheriff Mike Reese and the people who passed the Oregon law. Do they require that personnel, money, and equipment cannot be used to enforce other federal laws, such as kidnapping? No. If interim ICE Director Thomas Homan wants to look to charge people for violations of immigration law, here’s a good place to start. 

There are many statutes broken, and many parts of the statutes, such as in 8 US 1324, that were broken by the jail and the lawmakers who passed the law that disallows cooperation with federal law.   Thanks to Right Wing News

Marxist group disbands because members were too rich, white

A Marxist student group at Swarthmore College disbanded itself earlier this year after realizing that its members were too rich and too white to be real commies. 

According to screenshots confidentially provided to Campus Reform by an individual with access to the group’s private Facebook page, the demise of the Swarthmore Anti-Capitalist Collective (SACC) came in the wake of a farewell letter from a member who had decided the group could never be an effective proponent of “unproblematized anticapitalist politics” due to its “history of abuse, racism, and even classism.” 

“From my understanding SACC disbanded because they realized the makeup and tactics of their group was at odds with their espoused principles,” Swarthmore Conservative Society President Gilbert Guerra told Campus Reform. “Their main support base was middle-upper class white kids who enjoy jogging.” 

The farewell letter corroborates Guerra’s understanding, asserting that “SACC’s fundamental failure” was that “at its formation, it was made up of entirely white, with the exception of one person of color*, students,” and to make matters worse, “not one of [the founding members] are from low-income and/or working class backgrounds.” 

Arguing that “low-income people of color should never be an afterthought in a group whose politics supposedly focus on their liberation,” the author then went on to accuse SACC of having a “history of abuse, racism, and even classism that was never adequately addressed or recognized despite constantly being brought up as an issue.” 

Apparently this isn't the first Marxist group to be ripped apart by the historical necessity of dialectical contradictions, which made their dissolution historically inevitable.  
Thanks to The Peoples Cube